From Eroticism To Psycho-Aesthetics And Spirituality: The Keatsian Dimension
This paper focuses on Keats's eroticism, psycho-somatic aesthetics and spirituality. Sublimation as a positive aesthetic channelling of longing and desire is important here. Sublimation can lead to intense intellectual as well as spiritual contemplation and productivity. Keats's poetry and prose do not only serve as a psycho-aesthetic function, but also trigger a sublime and spiritual awareness, which should be the goal of the positive redirection of sexual energy. The erotic aspect of his life is inextricably intertwined with his epistemological and ontological speculations. In fact, when Keats talks about the truth of the imagination, "What the Imagination seizes as Beauty must be Truth - whether it existed before or not, - for I have the same idea of all our passions as of Love: they are all, in their sublime, creative of essential Beauty," we understand that it is only through the concrete that the spiritual can be apprehended. Associating the imagination with the sublime and essential Beauty is advancement from the corporeality or phenomenality of love. We are dealing with texts as an expression of Keats's erotic life and his presentation of the female, his effeminacy or his androgynous self. Within this framework also, we are going to briefly comment on the question of gender and feminist politics. It should be stressed that some work has already been done in this domain. That is, engaging in positive readings of Keats's erotic and sexual politics, with critics like Stuart Sperry, John Barnard and Christoph Bode offering examples. 
One of the most intriguing things about Keats's life is his sexuality. In fact, there seem to be more implicit or explicit inferences from his works rather than tangible biographical information from the rich sources that exist. There is no evidence, as of now, which testifies that Keats had any physical contact (sexual and erotic relationship) with Fanny Brawne or any other woman in whom he had interest. His sexual and erotic life  is therefore blurred, perhaps mysterious, if at all he really had one except through aesthetic self-textualising. This explains why his texts tend to be the referential points to any discussion in this domain. And though we can say that Keats's epistolary and poetic pieces are self-referential or self-representational, they go beyond this as they transcribe the search for ultimate love and Beauty through human relationships.
The question of gender, especially femininity and effeminacy or more appropriately the androgynous is very interesting in Keats's case. The poetic muse and the quest for the ideal are all connected with the feminine image. The intriguing question is: to what ends do the poet's representations take one? Or, how do we understand Keats's regard for women, and how does it challenge stereotypical views on him? And how does his aestheticism in this domain engender spirituality. In Romanticism and Gender (1993), Anne Mellor has commented on what she refers to as Keats and the ambiguity of gender. She contends that:
This contention shows the complexity of gender discourse in the poet, and shares similar concerns with those held by Elizabeth Bronfen and James Heffernan. Brofen's Over her Dead Body: Death, Femininity, and the Aesthetic (1992) adopts a feminine perspective with specific regards to Keats's 'The Eve of St. Agnes.' Contending from a biographical level, she argues that Keats's many letters in which he longs to possess both Fanny and death suggest his sexualised relationship to a feminised death. She stresses that the female body's association with the universal condition of mortality is because the woman as a man's object of desire is on the side of death and she so often serves as a non-reciprocal 'dead' figure of imaginary projection (62). Madeline, she intimates, can be interpreted as staging an aesthetic allegory of speaking death. Bronfen brings in an interesting gender issue:
Here again, we see the image of the woman as a simple quality for masculine authority and power. Heffernan's Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis (1993) asserts that Madeline is a self-inscribed figure of art, necessitates the poem to be read as an ekphrastic poem that accounts for the authority that Madeline invests in her aesthetic self-representation, and the ambivalent way in which the male poet engages with a feminised object of art. To Heffernan, the contest that ekphrasis stages is often powerfully gendered: the expression of a duel between male and female gazes, the voice of male speech striving to control a female image that is both alluring and threatening, of male narrative trying to overcome the fixating impact of beauty poised in space (1). With regard to the poem, the contest can be interpreted at two levels, textually between Porphyro and Madeline, and extra-textually, between the poet and Madeline. We cannot go into the details of Heffernan's analysis. What is important to note is the question of ambiguity and his conviction that the woman surrenders to male dominance at the end.
Our interest is neither the conflict between the sexes, nor the supposed ambiguity in the poet's presentation. The attempt is to see the feminine and masculine as mutually inclusive. This may account for why we take recourse to the middle path, understanding gender discourse in the poet not in terms of ambiguity, but rather in terms of the effeminate or androgynous quality that constitutes his psychology. With this view then, it becomes appropriate to strike a balance between the female and male gender in the poetic and epistolary expression of the poet.
With the exception of Apollo, the rest of aesthetic influences with regard to the question of the female image are represented by the women. Pan, Maia, Psyche, Autumn, Melancholy, Indolence, Phoebe, Moneta, and Fanny Brawne, are all female representations that strongly lurk in Keats's mind. Mellor's assertion can be right as far as we have to understand the poet as seeing the female as a significant representation of beauty, power and knowledge. But that Keats departs from this in trying to create a space for his masculinity sounds problematic, because his broodings show a persistent negotiation between the sexes, perhaps more emphasis on the female rather than the male self.
We are going to take the example of Brawne.  Keats wrote her thirty nine love letters, and a series of poems. And as aforementioned, some of these demonstrate a desire to depart from the erotic and sexual. The paradox about his unfulfilled tempestuous passion for this woman is that it enriched his aesthetic, philosophical and spiritual attitude to life and experience. Three of Keats's letters attract critical attention in the direction of our argument. These are letters addressed to Fanny and Charles Brown. The first to Fanny, dated 13 October 1819, is a subtle mixture of love and religion:
This letter can give enough room for one to accuse Keats of abusing religious terminology in his erotic and sexual poetics. Absorbing and dissolving are taken to stand for a strong adherence to corporeality and nothing else, but they could go further than that. The conviction here is that there should be nothing wrong in expressing a sense of religion that is limited with his imaging of Brawne, who, as a feminine principle, influences a great part of his psyche and aesthetics. Our readings show that whenever there is mention of Keats's aestheticism, there is always the possible reading of the sublime and spiritual, given that this aestheticism always points to the spiritual. The problematic is even greater if one contends that spirituality always involves a feminine undertone, or a female principle. But is Keats himself trying to distract any attempt to see him as going beyond the bounds of physical love, or is he contributing to that however difficult?
In the next letter, addressed as well to Fanny, he says, "I long to believe in immortality. I shall never be able to bid you an entire farewell. If I am destined to be happy with you here - how short is the longest Life. I wish to believe in immortality - I wish to live with you for ever." To Brown, he confesses about Fanny that, "My imagination is horribly vivid about her." It is not clear whether the poet is referring to a mundane immortality with his love or otherwise. So the realm in which this immortality is desired is not expressly stated. But if we take a close look at the attempt to spiritualise, we notice that the poet means something far beyond the simplicity of love. This leads to an important observation. 1819 and 1820 were the years that he showed a great maturity in aesthetic and spiritual consciousness. He wrote all his love letters as well as poems that were directly concerned with Fanny during this period. Though they demonstrate a strong sense of erotic and sexual longing, they should not be taken to be subversive or aversive to his spiritual quest. They are not a contradiction, but an expression of complexity. Poems like 'Ode to a Nightingale' and 'Ode on a Grecian Urn,' are not unconnected with human passion, but they express the strong desire for transcendence. As we shall see from a few poems, Keats's unrequited love and emotional starvation is paradoxically a gift and necessity to the poet's understanding of life's deeper meaning. Fanny or the female image is a source of inspiration, a poetic symbol, a repository not only of phenomenal, but of ideal Beauty as well. As a feminine symbol, she is part of the poet's creative psyche and psycho-aesthetically complements his masculinity.
'Lines to Fanny' is one of the so-called minor poems of Keats that can trigger interesting critical commentary. It grapples with creative day-dreaming as a positive psycho-aesthetic measure, related with sublimation. Keats is very direct, for he conceals nothing about his feelings for Fanny. The persistent question is whether poetic transcription is a mere re-affirmation of his unrequited longing, or if it plays a positive role in assuaging his erotic tension. The position here is that it obviously plays a therapeutic role, since the transforming of his erotic desire into aesthetic creativity suggests a modified frame of mind. In the first stanza Keats connects his longing with retrospection and introspection:
Keats's characteristic questioning attitude is very intriguing here. The first impression one may have is that he wants to be free from the object of his affections. But the situation seems to be more complex rather than its implied simplicity. This is a typical situation of poetic day-dreaming, with the absent lover serving as inspiration, and delineating the poet as paradoxically running away from what he desires. The question of remembrance and seeing does not presuppose the actual sight of the poet, but mental images, or mental mirroring of what is not there. He is inextricably bound to love, whose touch and memory cannot be wiped out from the conscious or subconscious mind, but could be surmounted. With regard to the muse, the poem is primarily inspired by the one to whom it is addressed. Yet Keats talks about another muse, whom he associates with divinity. Whatever this second muse represents, it is also associated with the female principle, and can be taken to be a transcendental surrogate for Fanny.
The poet continues with his longing for a new orientation that is superior to love:
These lines are very suggestive and continuously point to a dire need to depart from mundane love to a more intense aestheticism and perhaps spirituality. "Those moulted feathers" underscore a mythical reference, that is, the myth of Icarus and Dedalus. The desire to soar above fluttering love, and the determination to do so not through vulgar means, even if he is constantly tempted, is a pointer to a positive vision. The last stanza captures the same issue, with the poet caught between erotic desires and the resolution to abandon or transcend them for a superior engagement, "Enough! Enough! it is enough for me/To dream of thee." There is no real sign of frustration in this poem, and the poet's/Keats's decision for a new orientation is an added mark on the text itself as a medium through which he can positively come to terms with his love problems. Going back to the issue on gender poetics, one can say that Keats does not conceive of masculinity as absorbing femininity for its empowerment. Rather, masculinity seems to be unstable or dangling without the female principle. This therefore means that both are mutually inclusive of an inevitable androgynous self.
For more textual evidence to the argument, we are going to briefly discuss 'The Eve of St. Agnes' and Endymion.  The ongoing critical debate on 'The Eve of St. Agnes' has problematised the question as to whether the poem should be read as an affirmation of the erotic to spiritual, as an expression of auto-eroticism, or as an expression of erotic and spiritual futility.  Besides, the poem has also strongly attracted the question of gender. The stance taken here recognises the strength of the phenomenal nature of eroticism, but proposes to re-affirm the contention that the attempt to transcend the limitations of the materiality of the erotic to a spiritual realm, confirms part of Keats's understanding of the ontology of the imagination.
This poem presents the complex mixture of the expectations of the ritual involved on the eve of St. Agnes and the journey of Porphyro to win the heart of his love. We have established that it negotiates between the worldly and the spiritual, and tends to place emphasis on the latter, even if it is difficult to come by. There is no doubt that the background and atmosphere under which the romance is set is gothic and points to signs of danger and uncertainty (Stanzas I, X, and XII). But limiting interpretation in this domain, with the assertion of futility and tragedy, may sound too simplistic. This atmosphere justly represents the phenomenal reality which cannot be taken as a repository of spiritual illusion. The atmosphere does not mean that spiritual possibility is not inherent or feasible.
Keats's choice of romance needs a close examination with regard to this problematic. Prefering a story line which delineates ease and simplicity in erotic and spiritual matters, must not have been in line with his world vision, partly contributed by his own bitter but enriching experiences. Therefore, his narrative choice does not actually aim at failure, but from a hermeneutic perspective, aims at the difficulty and complexity that involves any serious aesthetic and spiritual engagement. Difficulty and complexity hardly mean impossibility. Porphyro does not have an easy task in getting into Madeline's chamber, nor does her vision so simply and clearly rendered or apprehended. This is a positive rather than a negative aspect of the story. Again, using a legend which associates love, marriage and spirituality must not have been coincidental to the poet, for such a story is far from being a parody or banality on religion. We will comment on those specific instances that substantiate the argument, focusing on a series of questions. Some include: Why does Porphyro chose to come on the same day that Madeline has to undergo her dream ritual? What are his intentions? Of whom does Madeline dream and what is the difference between her sleep dream and waking dream? If she dreams of Porphyro, is it because he is present in her chamber, or does this point to a holy or divine sanction? What makes the ending suggest a positive resonance on the part of the lovers? How does the romance portray Keats's imaginative dramatisation of the subtle intricacies involved in love?
Porphyro is not new to the castle, he has been wooing Madeline, and Angela at least knows him. He knows it is St. Agnes Eve, but his coming is not obviously to compel or force Madeline to dream about him, and besides, there is no indication that she is expecting him. In fact, Angela brings to his attention that Madeline prays for him every day and night ("Whose prayers for thee, each morn and evening,/Were never miss'd," Stanza XVIII), which suggests a devotion that she has for him. Porphyro has no evil intention, he implores all saints to enable him have sight of Madeline. He wants to worship her beauty and if possible touch and kiss her (Stanza IX). And when he is reprimanded by Angela for his unruly behaviour, he assures her that he has no desire to hurt the very object of his love (Stanzas XVI and XVII). The idea proposed by Jack Stillinger that he is dangerous, unheroic and even a rapist is therefore unfair. Like any other love seeker, his intentions sound normal, and his use of religious terminology does not imply an abuse of religion.
The most important instances are those of Madeline's supposed dream, the physical consummation of love with Porphyro and the elopement at the end of the poem. Madeline's vision and sleepy trance translate the complicated nature of the poem. When Porphyro plays music and wakes her up the situation is intriguing:
Questions come to mind regarding the nature of Madeline's dream. Has she been dreaming of Porphyro before he speaks in her sleepy state, or has she mistaken Porphyro's love protestations as her dream vision? It looks likely that her sleep vision points to a coincidence with Porphyro's presence. Whatever the case is, there is a difference between the visionary Porphyro and that of her waking experience. The words "painful change," "pallid," "chill" and "drear" contrast with "her dream so pure and deep," "sweetest vows" and "looks immortal." This contradiction suggests the duality that exists between the mundane and the spiritual. This description of Porphyro does not mean he or his love cannot possess spiritual ability. Porphyro's melting into her dream (Stanza XXVI) is a veiled expression of erotic consummation with her. Again, this is not necessarily subversive to spirituality.
Though a material act, sexual intercourse can have a divine dimension. In other words, as far as it is not the most preferential in face of spiritual matters, there is nothing spiritually wrong with the sexual act. In the next stanza, she is convinced by Porphyro that she has not been dreaming. Though she accepts this, she all the same wants Porphyro to be her saviour. Porphyro, who considers himself a pilgrim who has toiled in his quest for her, accepts to elope with her from the dangers of her dreary home. They get out with ease, and even though we understand that they got into the storm, it is evident that they are triumphant and would possibly overcome other obstacles.
Instead of saying that the poem is a negative fiction because of the dominance of phenomenal description, we can alternatively say that it points to the difficulties involved in the struggle between mundane attraction and transcendental aspiration. That this poem is an optimistic imaginative dramatisation of Keats's relationship with Fanny, can appropriate with the premise of self-referentiality or self-representaion. But this is only to an extent, that is, a psycho-aestheticised rather than an actual issue.
Endymion is another controversial poem when addressing the question of gender, eroticism, and spirituality. The first observation here is that Keats was very plain about his intentions in composing this poem, which was a testing and maturing of his creative and aesthetic potential. But the poem cannot evade the question on the present debate. It should be recalled that this poem suffered almost the same fate of Coleridge's 'Christabel.' Keats's case proved delicate not only because he was condemned for poetic immaturity, but also because the story was considered self-referential to Keats. With regard to the self-sexualising act or auto-eroticism, a contemporary like Byron expressed the conviction that the poem was a mental masturbation act by Keats. The focus is the spiritual dimension of the poem. We may take recourse to allegory; an allegory of the quest for ultimate Beauty, which connects with Keats's aestheticising strategies and Neo-platonic influences. In other words, the poem allegorises the Platonic quest for Beauty. Keats's imaginative reconstruction of the myth is not just for mere narrative fiction, but a complex and difficult rendition of the depth and insight of sensual and erotic politics.
Endymion's adventure in the quest for love and beauty, his encounters in the four major stages of this quest, his decisions and choices and final vision all point to the longing for and the departure from physical notions of human relationships to a spiritual vision, or alternatively, his desire to depart from earthly or material Beauty to spiritual Beauty. Following the Neo-platonic concept of love and absolute Beauty,  we can hermeneutically understand Endymion's search for this quality in the three apparently different female representations of his quest, who are a manifestation of physical and spiritual love as generative and self-transcending, to use John Barnard's words. Allegorically, Cynthia, Diana and the Indian maid are a progressive manifestation of Phoebe or the Moon goddess. The final vision of the poem is a divine sanction to Endymion's endurance, and suggests the spiritual possibility that goes beyond the erotic and sensual manifestations in the story. So the different dimensions of the Beauty of a single woman can be interpreted as relating to the Beauty of God and absolute reality. We are once more attracted to the question of the female principle as part of a spiritualising effort.
Endymion's quest from land through the underworld, ocean and back to land, this time connected with the celestial sphere, is a mixture of eroticism and sensuality and the drive towards the religious or the spiritual. There are many passages that substantiate this argument. We shall discuss a few of them. Passages that are highly erotic or sensual include Book I, (L. 835 - 42), Book II, (L. 739 - 743, 756 - 761, 806 - 821, and 944 - 948), Book III, (L. 983 - 985). Following the psycho-somatic realities of human beings, there should be nothing wrong with the expression of a strong erotic desire. In this case, passages of this sort are a positive psycho-aesthetic expression. Other specific passages include both the erotic and spiritual ramifications of Endymion's encounters. In Book I for instance he makes an interesting comment:
This excerpt suggests the possibility of finding immortality through love, and the idea that earthly love can lead to a spiritual awareness that goes above its materiality. Endymion is convinced that his broodings cannot be wrong, given that his hope is that which goes above the shadow of a dream. His determination to pursue his goal is further expressed by the end of the Book when he decides to embark into the cave despite Peona's warning of the dangers involved:
Endymion will not renounce his engagements and proposes not to let grief or sorrow deter him. Rather, he seeks a meditative mind and considers his adventure a pilgrimage. So what draws attention here is the process of learning and knowledge acquisition that love leads the hero into. His anticipated final vision is obviously not the mere sensuality and eroticism of the love, but the spiritual. In Book II a similar consciousness preoccupies Endymion, who this time is in the underworld. His questioning attitude points to his preferences:
The first part of the excerpt shows the complexity between earth-bound and spiritual love, manifested in Endymion's experience with his lover. He decides to get along the light of his goddess, seeing any other manifestation of light as inferior. Secondly, we have Endymion's plea to the goddess with regard to the myth of Alpheus and Arethusa. Their story may be comparable to his, and this plea may be transposed as his own as well, given that he has not attained his final vision of absolute Beauty. Book III continues with Endymion's adulation of the moon goddess, but points to a different emphasis in his quest. We have for instance:
Here again, Endymion seems to be caught between earthly love and celestial love. He wants to give preference to another love, but does not want the goddess to completely fade away. This is evident again in Book IV, where Endymion expresses a disturbed sense of dilemma as to whether he has to accept the goddess or reconcile with earthly life, or both:
Whatever the situation, Endymion makes the decision to stay with earthly love and his sister rather than pursue the goddess. It appears his quest for ideal Beauty is no longer what is important. But it appears at the same time that it is this choice that paradoxically leads him to his final vision of immortality and ideal Beauty. Cynthia in reality is the goddess and representative of the ideal. This is captured when Endymion tells his sister that he would command their grief and fate if it were God's will:
The transformation here is a reward for Endymion's strength and determination. His seems to be rescued by the very person he rejects, but more complicated is the idea that she is characterised by different variations, the most Supreme Being that which urged his quest from the outset. He can find spiritual hope in his love. This spiritual optimism connects with the vision of celestial Beauty. We must stress that Keats is still human even if he is spiritualised. So this spiritual discovery cannot be said to represent plenitude, since it remains deferral, justifying the hermeneutics of futurity. If we consider Endymion as a surrogate of Keats, the argument will be that he uses his experience through a consciously modified myth to express an advanced statement on the inter-implication between the material and aesthetico-spiritual aspects of love. We need not emphasise the question of the female principle. Here, the muse is connected with the female gender and spirituality as well. This can help in answering some of the questions raised with regard to Keats's androgynous mind. He is constantly mediating the female and male distinctions into the central pattern of his visionary experience. His optimism for sexual satisfaction is deeply transposed into optimism for spiritual plenitude.
We have all along tried to discuss the dynamics of eroticism and the female image in Keats. The psycho-aesthetic and spiritual dimensions of the imagination are treated alongside the different ways in which the female is perceived. While all the expectations of the discourse might not have been fully attained, we have seen the complex nature of texts with regard to sublimation, stereotypes and spirituality. We have shown the extent to which aspects of self-referentiality or self-representation can be applied in the interpretative context, and the great role the female plays in the poet's aesthetic and spiritual longings. To reassert our contention, this domain of the poets' life is far from being a less important aspect of his imaginative vision. It ties in with and strongly contributes to the general aesthetic as well as sublime and spiritual character of his life and philosophy. The dynamic and transforming self lends credence to the conviction an unending quest finds expression with regard to female representations in Keats's poetry and letters.
1. These critics in their respective works have underscored positive aspects of Keats's love poetry, commenting generally on a number of poems that exemplify the poet's erotic and sensuous yearnings. They see the poet as having appropriately sublimated his longing into lasting art.
2. Robert Gittings's seminal biography on the poet, John Keats (1968) provides some useful but controversial material on Keats's sexual life. In Appendix 3 (446 - 450), he discusses Keats and venereal disease, raising conjectural objections to the myth, which states that the poet's promiscuity in Oxford earned him either syphilis or gonorrhoea. The most interesting objection is that Keats was a virgin and could not have caught a venereal disease. When we examine a poem like 'Women, Wine, and Snuff,' we are left with more perplexity rather than clarity over the issue:
As to whether these lines delineate Keats's creed of a strong erotic and sensual life, or whether they are a parody of the Christian resurrection and the Trinity, is very complicated. Yet, no matter what direction Keats's eroticism is read, it is arguable that the poet always struggles to depart corporeality to the sublime or spiritual.
3. There is still much controversy on the image of Fanny Brawne, especially her attitude towards Keats. A good number of Keats's letters indicate that there was a correspondence between the two of them. But, there are no letters yet available that justify Brawne's side of the debate. This notwithstanding, there is evidence that Fanny wrote Keats's sister Frances a series of letters, published by Oxford University Press 1937, in which she confessed her interest and even love for the poet. This can help in the re-evaluation of Keats's supposed obsession with Fanny, given that he must have been encouraged by her.
4. We should be reminded that poems like 'Lamia,' 'Isabella,' and 'La Belle Dame Sans Merci' have quite often been read as an antithesis to 'The Eve of St. Agnes' and even Endymion. The contention here is that these poems' engagements (with the exception of 'Isabella') are dominantly on the mundane side of love with no authentic spiritual affirmation. This should not necessarily be taken as self-referential. Keats's choices might as well be didactic rather than deconstructionist or self-destabilising.
5. Jack Stillinger, in "The Hoodwinking of Madeline," out rightly dismisses the question of religion or spirituality, comparing the plight of Madeline with that of the Knight in 'La Belle Dame Sans Merci' and Lycius in 'Lamia.' Similar views have been aired out by Tilottama Rajan, "Threshold of Tragedy" 97 - 140, Dark Interpreter: The Discourse of Romanticism (1980). Her deconstructionist contention is that the poem cannot be a central exemplification of Keats's idealist poetics. Her assertion echoes that of Herbert Wright, whose rhetorical question (the very title of his essay), "Has Keats's "Eve of St. Agnes" a Tragic End?," contends that all of his romances have a tragic resonance. Mark Sandy's "Dream Lovers and Tragic Romance: Negative Fictions in Keats's Lamia, The Eve of St. Agnes, and Isabella," Romanticism on the Net (2002), extends Rajan's convictions. With regard to the lovers in the narratives, he holds that, such lovers' struggles against mutability are constantly tested by tragic realisations and the often suffocating infertility that their self-imposed isolation produces. He affirms that Keats's lovers remain forever on the verge of regeneration and unregenerated, eternally suspended like the unconsummated couple on the Grecian urn or the sculpted dead in 'The Eve of St. Agnes.'
6. A very fundamental though complicated rendition of the Neo-platonic philosophy of love finds expression in M. M. Bhattacheje's work, Keats and Spenser (1944). He quotes the Neo-platonic concept of the progression of the soul as elaborated by Pico Della Mirandola. This progressive movement involves six stages: From material Beauty we ascend to the First Fountain by six Degrees: (1) the soul through the sight represents to herself the Beauty of some particular person, inclines to it, is pleased with it and while she rests here, is in the first, the most imperfect material degree. (2) She reforms by her imagination the image she hath received, making it more perfect as more spiritual; and separating it from Matter, brings it a little nearer Ideal Beauty. (3) By the light of the agent Intellect abstracting this Form from all singularity, she considers the Universal Nature of Corporeal Beauty by itself; this is the highest degree that the soul can reach whilst she goes no further than sense. (4) Reflecting upon her own operation, the knowledge of Universal Beauty, and considering that everything founded in Matter is particular, she concludes this Universality proceeds not from the outward object, but her Intrinsical power; and reasons thus: If in the dimme Glasse of Material Phantasmes this beauty is represented by virtue of any Light, it follows that, beholding it in the clear Mirror of any substance devested of those Clouds, it will appear more perspicuous; thus turning into herself, she finds the Image of Ideal Beauty communicated to her by the intellect, the object of Celestial Love. (5) She ascends from this Idea in herself, to where Celestial Venus is, in her proper form: who in fullness of her Beauty not being comprehensible, by any particular Intellect, she, as much as in her lies, endeavours to be united to the first Mind, the chiefest of Creatures, and general Habitation of Ideal Beauty. Obtaining this, she terminates, and fixeth her journey; this is the sixth and last degree (109 - 110). Though these progressive stages may not be strictly applied in the case of Keats, what is understandable is that Endymion demonstrates a similar, even if complicated, progression from the materiality of love to a spiritual sphere, which transcends the material but must operate through it.
Keats, John. Works. Ed. Elizabeth Cook. Oxford: OUP, 1990.
© Charles Ngiewih TEKE, PhD, March 2010